<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for PeripherActions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peripheractions.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peripheractions.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>work in progress!!!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:29:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Drumchapel&#8217;s City Plan by GG</title>
		<link>http://peripheractions.wordpress.com/about/comments-on-drumchapels-city-plan/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>GG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peripheractions.wordpress.com/?page_id=22#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Yes indeed, as the brochure says, Gaskin View is to be the first of ... however many... 
However &#039;Gaskin View&#039; is simply the name of a &#039;housing estate&#039;, an estate of new housing, for which the developers, as they do in such instances, have provided a name. As someone, popular on the radio at the time, used to say, &quot;It doesn&#039;t have to mean nuttin&#039;&quot;.

Every new housing development gets its own wee title. I think it helps the lorry drivers and development people find it in amongst the possibly very many other sites which they have to frequent, it saves them mixing up one site in say Glasgow with another in say Birmingham. To us they may be many hundreds of miles apart, to those involved in building them they can be but a paragraph apart on a single sheet of the project manager&#039;s time sheet.

Gaskin view is under development. This fact can be witnessed from the windows of homes in other areas of Drumchapel. Some three, or is it four, detached homes have already been built. How many more will be completed, in the these financially restricted times, is another matter.
I too have read the &#039;plans&#039; for Drumchapel you include on this page.
I noted with great interest the inclusion of the information that,

&quot;The Local Development Strategy will address these transport issues and consider the feasibility of new distributor roads from Antonine Way to Linkwood Drive and Peel Glen Road to Kinfauns Drive.&quot;
Fascinating facts indeed. Sorry, did I say &#039;facts&#039;? 

There is no more likelihood of said road being built than there is of any other major road works in the Drumchapel area. In my opinion, back when that &#039;plan&#039; was aired, someone was looking for yet more &#039;delaying tactics&#039; to cover the lack of Any forward movement for the Drumchapel area. Luckily, some might say, for whoever was searching for said delaying tactics, the present financial crisis couldn&#039;t have come at a more opportune moment. 

As always, as anyone who has lived in GCC or GHA homes over the years can testify, delaying tactics are the name of the game in the Drumchapel area ... Take for example the proposed rental changes for GHA tenants.

All GHA tenants were recently notified in writing that those in homes awaiting demolition will not see any rise in rents. Those who are not under the threat of demolition will see an increase in rents.
What a fair way of doing things you might think.

However, what about those in the demolition &#039;no mans land&#039; of the GHA&#039;s making, where GHA management have (verbally) informed fewer than twenty people (but where no-one has been officially informed .. with partial demolition &#039;&#039;in around five years&#039;&#039; being what myself and fewer than fifteen others were *personally* informed off)?

Ah, well, as no official notice of demolition has been served, their rents will be going up!
So, while on the one hand Drumchapel&#039;s future is as purported in the document you have highlighted on this page, on the other, in reality, we have the threat of demolition hanging over our heads. We have the influx of tenants from other, some might say, less salubrious high rise demolitions, we have the rumour mill working overtime, due in no small part to the lack of any tangible information,we have the increased turnover of tenancies resulting from this intolerable and most unfair situation and now, to cap it all off, we have a rise in rents which is totally counter to anyone&#039;s best interest as said rise will simply exacerbate the above situation.

Pardon my rant.
It&#039;s been niggling away at me for weeks now.
Ever since I first read about that road, as mentioned in the document on this page...,
I shall now copy this over to my own Blog.
and provide a link to this page of course.
Thank You for your enlightening and interesting Drumchapel pages.
I&#039;ll away and see what else I can find to fire my thought processes.
Thank You

Hardly fair you might think, but that is in fact the situation for hundreds of tenants in the drumchapel area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes indeed, as the brochure says, Gaskin View is to be the first of &#8230; however many&#8230;<br />
However &#8216;Gaskin View&#8217; is simply the name of a &#8216;housing estate&#8217;, an estate of new housing, for which the developers, as they do in such instances, have provided a name. As someone, popular on the radio at the time, used to say, &#8220;It doesn&#8217;t have to mean nuttin&#8217;&#8221;.</p>
<p>Every new housing development gets its own wee title. I think it helps the lorry drivers and development people find it in amongst the possibly very many other sites which they have to frequent, it saves them mixing up one site in say Glasgow with another in say Birmingham. To us they may be many hundreds of miles apart, to those involved in building them they can be but a paragraph apart on a single sheet of the project manager&#8217;s time sheet.</p>
<p>Gaskin view is under development. This fact can be witnessed from the windows of homes in other areas of Drumchapel. Some three, or is it four, detached homes have already been built. How many more will be completed, in the these financially restricted times, is another matter.<br />
I too have read the &#8216;plans&#8217; for Drumchapel you include on this page.<br />
I noted with great interest the inclusion of the information that,</p>
<p>&#8220;The Local Development Strategy will address these transport issues and consider the feasibility of new distributor roads from Antonine Way to Linkwood Drive and Peel Glen Road to Kinfauns Drive.&#8221;<br />
Fascinating facts indeed. Sorry, did I say &#8216;facts&#8217;? </p>
<p>There is no more likelihood of said road being built than there is of any other major road works in the Drumchapel area. In my opinion, back when that &#8216;plan&#8217; was aired, someone was looking for yet more &#8216;delaying tactics&#8217; to cover the lack of Any forward movement for the Drumchapel area. Luckily, some might say, for whoever was searching for said delaying tactics, the present financial crisis couldn&#8217;t have come at a more opportune moment. </p>
<p>As always, as anyone who has lived in GCC or GHA homes over the years can testify, delaying tactics are the name of the game in the Drumchapel area &#8230; Take for example the proposed rental changes for GHA tenants.</p>
<p>All GHA tenants were recently notified in writing that those in homes awaiting demolition will not see any rise in rents. Those who are not under the threat of demolition will see an increase in rents.<br />
What a fair way of doing things you might think.</p>
<p>However, what about those in the demolition &#8216;no mans land&#8217; of the GHA&#8217;s making, where GHA management have (verbally) informed fewer than twenty people (but where no-one has been officially informed .. with partial demolition &#8221;in around five years&#8221; being what myself and fewer than fifteen others were *personally* informed off)?</p>
<p>Ah, well, as no official notice of demolition has been served, their rents will be going up!<br />
So, while on the one hand Drumchapel&#8217;s future is as purported in the document you have highlighted on this page, on the other, in reality, we have the threat of demolition hanging over our heads. We have the influx of tenants from other, some might say, less salubrious high rise demolitions, we have the rumour mill working overtime, due in no small part to the lack of any tangible information,we have the increased turnover of tenancies resulting from this intolerable and most unfair situation and now, to cap it all off, we have a rise in rents which is totally counter to anyone&#8217;s best interest as said rise will simply exacerbate the above situation.</p>
<p>Pardon my rant.<br />
It&#8217;s been niggling away at me for weeks now.<br />
Ever since I first read about that road, as mentioned in the document on this page&#8230;,<br />
I shall now copy this over to my own Blog.<br />
and provide a link to this page of course.<br />
Thank You for your enlightening and interesting Drumchapel pages.<br />
I&#8217;ll away and see what else I can find to fire my thought processes.<br />
Thank You</p>
<p>Hardly fair you might think, but that is in fact the situation for hundreds of tenants in the drumchapel area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TEXTS by Gary Malcolmson</title>
		<link>http://peripheractions.wordpress.com/texts/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Malcolmson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peripheractions.wordpress.com/?page_id=163#comment-19</guid>
		<description>I dont remember who the contractor was on the sign, could find out, should be in city centre tomoro. They might use this development as a precedent for future actions unless there is one already in place :S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont remember who the contractor was on the sign, could find out, should be in city centre tomoro. They might use this development as a precedent for future actions unless there is one already in place :S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TEXTS by anna</title>
		<link>http://peripheractions.wordpress.com/texts/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peripheractions.wordpress.com/?page_id=163#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Won the right to whom?? I was in the idea parks are common goods. This is starting to be an usual practice here, as well as to create an issue about a place to facilitate further speculation...
Yes I think is Richmond Park</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Won the right to whom?? I was in the idea parks are common goods. This is starting to be an usual practice here, as well as to create an issue about a place to facilitate further speculation&#8230;<br />
Yes I think is Richmond Park</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TEXTS by Gary Malcolmson</title>
		<link>http://peripheractions.wordpress.com/texts/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Malcolmson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peripheractions.wordpress.com/?page_id=163#comment-17</guid>
		<description>The Council, i&#039;m sure, won the right to sell the land to a developer, it is underway just now if it&#039;s Richmond Park that you are talking about. We found out about it during the East End Paths job, seemed a shame since it was a nice park.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Council, i&#8217;m sure, won the right to sell the land to a developer, it is underway just now if it&#8217;s Richmond Park that you are talking about. We found out about it during the East End Paths job, seemed a shame since it was a nice park.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DRUMCHAPEL by Mark Langdon</title>
		<link>http://peripheractions.wordpress.com/about/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Langdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Looking forward to being part of this exciting experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking forward to being part of this exciting experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Working in August. by jep</title>
		<link>http://peripheractions.wordpress.com/2008/08/16/14th-august-surviving-the-fringe/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>jep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 22:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peripheractions.wordpress.com/?p=83#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Els peus i les mans també son perifèrics. La perifèria dona sentit i equilibra l&#039;esforç, en aquest cas, d&#039;una societat que intenta avançar malgrat un cos cansat i exedit per la codícia.
tot anirà bé</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Els peus i les mans també son perifèrics. La perifèria dona sentit i equilibra l&#8217;esforç, en aquest cas, d&#8217;una societat que intenta avançar malgrat un cos cansat i exedit per la codícia.<br />
tot anirà bé</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DRUMCHAPEL LOG by yvonne taylor</title>
		<link>http://peripheractions.wordpress.com/drumchapel-log/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>yvonne taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 23:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peripheractions.wordpress.com/?page_id=40#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I came across the drum when I was 14,I&#039;m 50 now, I was Yvonne Mair then, when I was going out with Jim Russell, guess the love affair started then...with the drum...not in contact with Jim anymore but he was an artist too, good memories.
I&#039;ve been working up here since 1996 with the Drumchapel Arts Workshop, I love the energy and the atmosphere. I&#039;ve never lived in the drum but somehow it feels like home. I&#039;ve met alot of good people, love what&#039;s happeninghere now  and really pleased to see and work with Anna &amp; Jep again xxx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came across the drum when I was 14,I&#8217;m 50 now, I was Yvonne Mair then, when I was going out with Jim Russell, guess the love affair started then&#8230;with the drum&#8230;not in contact with Jim anymore but he was an artist too, good memories.<br />
I&#8217;ve been working up here since 1996 with the Drumchapel Arts Workshop, I love the energy and the atmosphere. I&#8217;ve never lived in the drum but somehow it feels like home. I&#8217;ve met alot of good people, love what&#8217;s happeninghere now  and really pleased to see and work with Anna &amp; Jep again xxx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DRUMCHAPEL LOG by Mary Malcolmson</title>
		<link>http://peripheractions.wordpress.com/drumchapel-log/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Malcolmson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peripheractions.wordpress.com/?page_id=40#comment-4</guid>
		<description>

At the age of 45 I left Drumchapel and now live in the city centre, however, when asked where I come from I always say Drumchapel not Glasgow and suppose I always will, it has its faults, as do we all, but members of the families you grew up around still live their as do many friends and work colleagues. They can change the landscape but not the memories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the age of 45 I left Drumchapel and now live in the city centre, however, when asked where I come from I always say Drumchapel not Glasgow and suppose I always will, it has its faults, as do we all, but members of the families you grew up around still live their as do many friends and work colleagues. They can change the landscape but not the memories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on a project in progress by Mr WordPress</title>
		<link>http://peripheractions.wordpress.com/2008/06/29/hello-world/#comment-1</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr WordPress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 11:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1</guid>
		<description>Hi, this is a comment.&lt;br /&gt;To delete a comment, just log in, and view the posts&#039; comments, there you will have the option to edit or delete them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, this is a comment.<br />To delete a comment, just log in, and view the posts&#8217; comments, there you will have the option to edit or delete them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
